Why bother?

I have had it trying to convince folks about the merits of my ideas/book regarding the great mysteries of life and universe. Perhaps, the stuff I’m talking about is way ahead of its time. Oh well. It’s your prerogative to stick to the status quo. Peace.

Not making up anything

@361240: Note that I have not made up anything in my book/videos. I have merely defined (assigned meaning) to LTS, Life-matter, Creation1, 2, 3, Inter-domain inconsistency, Nalture, Napture, etc. So, I am not asking you to believe (or not believe) in anything. My book/videos are meant to promote self-determination of what we believe regarding nature, life, prayer, future, death, afterlife, etc. They are intended to stretch our imagination and enlighten us in the process, since it is authorized to think.

Fallacies?

@jamesellis33: Are you saying what I call in the video Creation1, Creation2, and Creation3 are fallacies? If so, I am not sure why, since I have merely defined (i.e., assigned meaning to) them. I have not made anything up per se. Are zero and infinity fallacies too? In my view, while the smallest/largest numbers are time-space related, zero/infinity are LTS related. Do you see the subtle difference?

Is LTS a part of our reality?

@enfomy: You asked: "Isn't it a contradiction to say this LTS, which sounds a lot like the concept of nothing, should still be apart of our reality?" I hold that LTS is a realm that is TOTALLY SEPARATE from our time-space universe. In my view, terms like "existence", "truth", and "reality" are applicable only to the t-s universe related (not the LTS related). So, the answer to your question is No it is not contradictory. Let me know if you did not follow that.